Not known Factual Statements About how cases are handled that are not mentioned in law

In addition to the primary punishment, the court can also impose a fine on the offender. The fine’s amount is at the discretion in the court and is meant to serve as an additional deterrent.

“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon from the prosecution against the petitioner and his earlier mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined through the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.

V)      During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal to the deceased was caused because of the petitioner but in support of opinion on the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is offered around the file and mere ipsi dixit of police is just not binding around the Court.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been on the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're issue to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion can be viewed as, however, we're apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject to the approval from the competent authority.

R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade from the accused has not been conducted nonetheless. In the moment case, now the accused attempted to just take advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture on the petitioner was extensively circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity in the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance towards the accused that the identity should not be exposed to the witnesses, particularly for your witness to establish the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and developed images. Moreover, the images shown about the media expose that a mask wasn't placed over the accused to hide his identity till he was put up for an identification parade. Making pictures of your accused publically, both by showing the same on the witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or system, would create doubt inside the proceedings from the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to make certain that there is no chance to the witness to begin to see the accused before going for the identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the press or electronic media. Offered the reasons elaborated over, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

Reasonable grounds are offered within the record to connect the petitioner with the commission on the alleged offence. Even though punishment of the alleged offence does not drop during the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. however figured out Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is from the credit in the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls within the exception where bail cannot be granted even from the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steering has become sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of the same is hereby reproduced:

In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for your accused who intentionally murdered the sufferer.

Electronic and paper court records retained for the court site is usually viewed for the courthouse for free, however there is often a rate of ten cents for each page to print from a public access terminal.

Accessing free case law sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and any one seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.

If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only carried out if the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to get appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

In order to prove murder, there needs to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.

In the event the click here employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only performed if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Finding reliable free case law sites may be challenging. Numerous websites require subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case regulation resources in Pakistan, offering you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.